
Analyzes Justice Clarence Thomas's originalist opinions and efforts to restore the framers' limited constitutional order against the administrative state and living Constitution.
Analyzes Justice Clarence Thomas's originalist opinions and efforts to restore the framers' limited constitutional order against the administrative state and living Constitution.
When Clarence Thomas joined the Supreme Court in 1991, he found with dismay that it was interpreting a very different Constitution from the one the framers had written--the one that had established a federal government manned by the people's own elected representatives, charged with protecting citizens' inborn rights while leaving them free to work out their individual happiness themselves, in their families, communities, and states. He found that his predecessors on the Court were complicit in ...
will contain mild spoilers
No romantic or sexual content present
No violence or gore present
No evidence found in available sources
No evidence found in available sources
No evidence found in available sources
No evidence found in available sources
No magic or witchcraft present
No occult or demonology content present
Central focus on originalism, the administrative state, and constitutional interpretation
No evidence found in available sources
Covers segregation, racial injustice, and denial of Black citizenship rights
No information found